Charge compensation and capacity fading in LiCoO2 at high voltage investigated by soft x-ray absorption spectroscopy
Long Xing-Hui1, 2, 3, Wu Yan-Ru1, 2, 3, Zhang Nian1, 2, Yu Peng-Fei1, 2, †, Feng Xue-Fei4, Zheng Shun1, 2, 3, Fu Jia-Min1, 2, 5, Liu Xiao-Song1, 2, 5, Liu Na6, Wang Meng6, Xu Lei-Min6, Chen Jin-Ming7, Lee Jenn-Min7
State Key Laboratory of Functional Materials for Informatics, Shanghai Institute of Microsystem and Information Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200050, China
Center for Excellence in Superconducting Electronics, Shanghai Institute of Microsystem and Information Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200050, China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Advanced Light Source, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
School of Physical Science and Technology, Shanghai Tech University, Shanghai 200031, China
NingDe Amperex Technology Limited, Ningde 352100, China
“National” Synchrotron Radiation Research Centre, Hsinchu 30076, Taiwan, China

 

† Corresponding author. E-mail: ypfaq@mail.sim.ac.cn

Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 21503263, U1632269, 21473235, and 11227902).

Abstract
Abstract

In order to obtain an in-depth insight into the mechanism of charge compensation and capacity fading in LiCoO2, the evolution of electronic structure of LiCoO2 at different cutoff voltages and after different cycles are studied by soft x-ray absorption spectroscopy in total electron (TEY) and fluorescence (TFY) detection modes, which provide surface and bulk information, respectively. The spectra of Co L2,3-edge indicate that Co contributes to charge compensation below 4.4 V. Combining with the spectra of O K-edge, it manifests that only O contributes to electron compensation above 4.4 V with the formation of local O 2p holes both on the surface and in the bulk, where the surficial O evolves more remarkably. The evolution of the O 2p holes gives an explanation to the origin of or even O2. A comparison between the TEY and TFY of O K-edge spectra of LiCoO2 cycled in a range from 3 V to 4.6 V indicates both the structural change in the bulk and aggregation of lithium salts on the electrode surface are responsible for the capacity fading. However, the latter is found to play a more important role after many cycles.

1. Introduction

Layered LiCoO2 cathode, which is used in the first commercial lithium ion battery (LIB), still dominates the portable electronic device market nowadays.[1,2] Its theoretical capacity can reach up to , with all the Li ions extracted. The practical capacity, however, is only about with the cutoff voltage up to 4.2 V (versus Li/Li+), corresponding to only 0.5 Li per CoO2 extracted.[3] One way to enhance its capacity is to charge the battery cell to higher potential above 4.2 V. However, LiCoO2 cycled with a cutoff voltage higher than 4.2 V suffers a severe capacity fading.[4,5] With the aim to improve both the energy density and cycling performance, the mechanism of capacity fading when LiCoO2 serving at high cutoff voltage () has been studied intensively from the viewpoint of both structure and electrochemistry.[4,611] The irreversible phase transition in the bulk was first considered as the main reason of the capacity loss.[4] Later, the side reaction at the electrode/electrolyte interface was reported to play a more important role in the capacity loss,[6,7,1012] which initiated the development of surface coating methods, to some extent, to improve the cycling stability.[1315]

Because the lithiation/delithiation are always accompanied with insertion/extraction of electrons into/from the electrodes, investigation on the evolution of electronic structure of LiCoO2 will provide new information for better understanding of the origin of extra capacity at high voltage and the mechanism of capacity fading.[1620] Goodenough pointed out that the Co4+/Co3+ redox couple at the top of the O band gave an intrinsic voltage limit and that the formation of peroxide with Li extracted led to a loss of O2.[18] The charge transfer between electrode and electrolyte was thought to result in the formation of solid-electrolyte interface (SEI) film.[18,21] Experimental studies on the electronic structure were carried out by various spectroscopic characterization techniques.[2233] Among them, soft x-ray absorption spectroscopy (sXAS) is one of the most powerful tools because of its elemental and chemical sensitivity, high energy resolution. More importantly, for 3d transition-metal oxides, the sXAS directly probes the metal-3d and oxygen-2p unoccupied electronic structure, which are the key states to regulate the fundamental properties and practical performances of most current metal-oxide cathodes. Therefore, it has been widely employed in the battery research.[3440]

Several sXAS studies focusing on the electronic structure of LiCoO2 have been reported.[2426,2830] Montoro et al.[24,25] showed that the Co ions remain mostly unaffected and always in trivalent low-spin states with Li deintercalated chemically. On the other hand, the O was partially oxidized during Li chemical extraction. Uchimoto et al.[26] studied the electronic structure of LiCoO2 during the electrochemical reaction and concluded that the Co ions were still 3+ even with 0.8Li extracted from LiCoO2 while the oxidation of O ions mainly took place. Conversely, Yoon et al.[28] demonstrated that charge compensation could be achieved in O and Co ions simultaneously with LiCoO2 film electrode cycled in a range between 3 V and 4.2 V. They also suggested that the capacity fading of the LiCoO2 could be related to the decrease of Co–O bond covalency. Chen et al.[30] studied the chemically delithiated LiCoO2 and also demonstrated the contribution of Co ions should not be negligible in the charge compensation process. Meanwhile, they found that the oxidation of O2− on the surface and in the bulk were different. Mizokawa et al.[41] emphasized the critical role of O 2p holes and thought that the O 2p holes were bonded to the Co4+ sites and Li+ vacancy, which helped to improve the electronic and Li+ conductivities. Obviously, the charge compensation from O has been confirmed through the sXAS studies, which strongly supports the model proposed by Goodenough. Meanwhile, the contribution of Co ions to the charge compensation process has also been verified gradually. Nevertheless, the detailed mechanism of the charge compensation from O is still under debate. According to Goodenough’s model, LiCoO2 will suffer structure collapse due to the O loss at the voltage higher than 4.2 V. However, all the studies above did not give any further description of the evolution of O related to the O loss on the surface or in the bulk. It should also be noted that the evolution of O 2p holes needs to be studied carefully because of the convolution of features at the pre-edge of O K-edge sXAS resulting from O 2p hole and the hybridization between Co and O. Furthermore, the correlation between capacity fading and evolution of electronic structure during cycling with the cutoff voltage higher than 4.2 V invokes more investigation.

In this work, we study the LiCoO2 cathodes of commercial pouch cells from Contemporary Amperex Technology Ltd (CATL, Ningde, Fujian). Benefiting from the strict manufacturing processes, a solid evolution of surface and bulk electronic structure could be explored by measuring soft x-ray absorption spectra in TEY and TFY modes with surface () and bulk () sensitivity, respectively. In our case, the evolution of Co L2,3 and O K-edge are examined carefully to investigate the charge compensation of O. The correlations between capacity fading and the evolution of electronic structure are studied by comparing the O K-edge spectra of LiCoO2 cycled in the range of 3 V to 4.6 V and 3 V to 4.4 V both in TEY and TFY modes. This study can provide clues to the above debates and crucial information for seeking for a better treatment process to improve the cyclability.

2. Experimental methods
2.1. Battery test and sample preparation

Pouch full cells were prepared by the CATL Company. The cathode was composed of LiCoO2, super P black (SP), and polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) in a weight ratio of 94:3:3. The anode was made of hard carbon and PVDF binder in a weight ratio of 92:8. The electrolyte of LiPF6 () was mixed in ethylene carbonate/diethyl carbonate (EC/DMC) with volume ratio 1:1. The assembly process was operated in a drying room.

All cells were tested by using the electrochemical workstation at 45 °C. For the 1st cycle, the cells produced in the same batch were firstly charged to 3.9 V at a rate of 0.1 C then to a certain cutoff voltage (i.e., 4.2 V, 4.4 V or 4.6 V) at a rate of 0.7 C and kept for 0.2 h, and then discharged to 3 V at a rate of 0.7 C and kept for 0.2 h. For the subsequent cycling test, the schedule was almost the same as that in the 1st cycle except that the charging rate to 3.9 V is 0.7 C.

All the tested cells were transported into Ar-filled glovebox and disassembled at an Ar atmosphere with O2 and H2O content lower than 0.1 ppm. The cathode samples were washed three times by using anhydrous DMC to remove the interference of electrolyte. To avoid any possible interference from the atmosphere, the samples were sealed with Al-plastic bags, taken to the Taiwan Light Source (TLS), and then transferred to the test chamber through an Ar-filled glovebox.

The samples with various cutoff voltage including 3.9 V, 4.2 V, 4.4 V, and 4.6 V at the 1st cycle were prepared for the charge compensation study. Samples at fully charged (4.4 V or 4.6 V) or discharged (3 V) states with the different capacity retention ratios (i.e., 100%, 99%, 51%, 42% at 4.6 V, and 100%, 72%, 50% at 3 V) and samples cycled 10 times between different voltage ranges (3 V–4.4 V versus 3 V–4.6 V) were prepared for studying the correlation between the evolution of the electronic structure and capacity fading.

2.2. Soft x-ray absorption spectroscopy

The sXAS measurements of the LiCoO2 cathode were carried out at beamline 20A1 of the Taiwan Light Source (TLS) at HsinChu, Taiwan, beamline 08U of Shanghai Synchrotron Facility (SSRF) and beamline 12B-a of the National Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory (NSRL) at Hefei. In particular, the beamline 20A1 was equipped with a 6-m high-energy spherical grating monochromator (6-m HSGM) to supply a photon beam with resolving power up to 8000. The spectra of Co L2,3 and O K-edge were collected in TEY and TFY mode in an ultrahigh-vacuum chamber with a base pressure of about (1 Torr = 1.33322 × 102 Pa). The TEY and TFY spectra were normalized to the photon flux of incident beam monitored by the Au mesh. The photon energy was calibrated with the spectra of reference samples (CoO for Co L2,3-edge and SrTiO3 for O K-edge).

3. Results and discussion
3.1. Competition between amount of Li+ extraction and cycling performance

The amount of Li+ extraction with various cutoff voltages is shown in Fig. 1(a). With the cutoff voltage increasing in steps of 0.1 V from 4.3 V to 4.6 V, the corresponding increments of the amount of Li+ extraction are 0.0811, 0.0607, and 0.1083, which correspond to 8.1%, 6.1%, and 10.8% of the theoretical capacity of LiCoO2, respectively. It indicates that each increment of voltage by 0.1 V from 4.3 V is crucial to improve the energy density of the LiCoO2 cell, among which the increase from 4.5 V to 4.6 V is the most significant.

Fig. 1. (color online) Electrochemical tests of LiCoO2, showing (a) amount of Li+ increasing with upper cutoff voltage, and (b) cycling performances for the charge cutoff voltages of 4.4, 4.5, and 4.6 V.

The cycling performances with the upper cutoff voltage of 4.4, 4.5, and 4.6 V are shown in Fig. 1(b). The LiCoO2/carbon battery cycled between 3 V and 4.4 V only has a capacity loss of 4.22% after 120 cycles. With the upper cutoff voltage increased to 4.5 V, the cells can only keep 19.40% of the initial capacity after 110 cycles. The capacity decreases sharply to 0 within 20 cycles with the upper cutoff voltage of 4.6 V. It demonstrates that the cycling performance is severely deteriorated by each increase of 0.1 V from 4.4 V even though the energy density can be improved notably.

3.2. Charge compensation during Li extraction

To avoid any possible interference from the side reaction at the electrode/electrolyte interface, the TFY spectra of Co L2,3-edge and O K-edge, which reflect the bulk evolution, are firstly studied. As shown in Fig. 2(a), Co L-edge is divided into L2 (792 eV to 802 eV) and L3-edge (778 eV to 788 eV), which originate from the transition from the 2p1/2 and 2p3/2 states due to the core-hole spin-orbital coupling. Co L3-edge of the initial LiCoO2 has 3 peak features, marked as B, A, and C, respectively.

Fig. 2. (color online) (a) Normalized Co L2,3-edge x-ray absorption spectra and (b) normalized oxygen K-edge x-ray absorption spectra of Li1−xCoO2 with respect to the cut-off voltage in the TFY mode, and ((c) and (d)) magnified parts of Co L3 and O K pre-edge spectra above 4.4 V, respectively, which are convenient for comparison.

When charged to 3.9 V, the intensity of peak B increases notably while the peak A shifts to higher energy and becomes broader. During charging from 3.9 V to 4.4 V, the intensity of peak B continues to increase while peak A continues to shift to higher energy and become broader. However, there is almost no change when charging from 4.4 V to 4.6 V, as confirmed by the careful comparison in Fig. 2(c). In other words, all the features of the Co L3-edge, including the increasing intensity of peak B and blue-shift of peak A, evolve below 4.4 V. In addition, it should be noticed that peak C disappears gradually when the battery is charged to 4.6 V. We cannot determine, however, whether it is an intrinsic evolution or just because of the broadening of peak A. Moreover, it has been suggested that peak C results from Co3+ in high spin state and is less sensitive to the distortion of Co–O octahedron.[42,43] Thus, only the evolution of features B and A are discussed. Peak B is attributed to the generation of Co2+ in some research.[44,45] If this assignment were true, we would conclude that a fair amount of Co2+ ions generate at least at 3.9 V during the 1st charging process. It contradicts with the experimental facts that major redox should be oxidized with Li+ extracted. In addition, CoO is thought to be electrochemical inactive in the voltage range from 3 to 4.6 V.[46,47] Thus the assignment also contradicts with the good cyclability of LiCoO2 with a cutoff voltage less than 4.2 V. A more reasonable assignment is the contribution from Co4+.[41] The evolution of peak B indicates that the oxidation of Co3+ to Co4+ provides electrons with the battery being charged below 4.4 V. Peak A, which takes the major part in Co L-edge, is mainly related to Co3+. It has been pointed out that the gravity of the L3 shifts to higher energy mainly due to the oxidation of Co3+.[45,48] Someone has suggested that the evolution of peak A is also closely associated with the re-hybridization between Co and O molecular orbital.[28,49] Nevertheless, the evolution of peak A is consistent with peak B, indicating that the changes of Co occur below 4.4 V.

Next, the corresponding spectra of O K-edge are studied. As shown in Fig. 2(b), O K-edge spectra can be divided into two parts. The pre-edge peaks with the energy lower than 535 eV are assigned to the transitions from oxygen 1 s orbital to the states hybridized between O 2p orbital and Co 3d orbital. The hump above 535 eV is assigned to the transition to the states hybridized between O 2p and Co 4sp orbitals. The O K pre-edge of the pristine LiCoO2 has only one notable feature, marked as peak a. Because most of Co3+ ions stay at the low-spin state,[24,45] where t2g orbital is fully filled while eg is completely unfilled (i.e. ), peak a is thought to originate from the hybridization between Co3+ eg states with O 2p states. When the battery is charged to 3.9 V, two new notable features b1 and b2 at lower energy appear. When they are charged from 3.9 V to 4.4 V, the intensity of peaks b1 and b2 increase a bit. Peaks b1 and b2 were reported to result from the hybridization of O 2p states with the t2g and eg states of Co4+.[41] Thus the increasing intensity is consistent with the oxidation from Co3+ to Co4+, where both the amount of holes in 3d states and the covalency of Co–O increase. So far, the spectral changes of the O K-edge XAS, though relatively more dramatic, are consistent with those of Co L2,3-edge XAS with respect to the Li extraction. It should be noted that because of the convolution of features at O–K pre-edge resulting from both O 2p hole and the hybridization between Co and O, it is difficult to distinguish the contribution of O 2p holes to the electron compensation below 4.4 V.

What is more attractive is the evolution of O K-edge above 4.4 V where there is no obvious variation at the Co L2,3-edge. By careful comparison, as shown in Fig. 2(d), peak intensity in the range of about 528 eV–528.8 eV increases slightly while that in the range of about 529 eV–532 eV decreases from 4.4 V to 4.6 V. This evolution corresponds to the charge compensation from O, indicating the formation of O 2p hole with extra Li+ extraction. Moreover, we can conclude that the O 2p holes are very local or even not related to the Co-O bond at all, otherwise the Co L-edge will change more or less. The feature in the range of about 529 eV–532 eV is different from that reported previously where O 2p holes were thought to lie between 530 eV–535 eV and led the intensity of peaks to increase with the Li+ extracted.[5052] The different position might result from a different coordination environment around O in the LixCoO2 compared with those in the Li-excess cathodes. The reducing intensity of this feature might be related to the increasing intensity of the feature in the range of about 528 eV–528.8 eV. This feature is consistent with the feature of reported on KO2 previously and has also been found in the study on Li2MnO3.[53,54] Thus the evolution of these two features might indicate that the formation of may result from the combination of the O anions with a local hole, which gives an explanation to the origin of or even the evolution of O2 and needs more confirmation in future. Nevertheless, our results indicate that the evolution of O 2p holes can be found in LiCoO2 conventional cathodes.

3.3. Surficial evolution with Li extraction

The TEY spectra of Co L2,3 are shown in Fig. 3(a). The discussion on the Co TEY will be simplified as the evolution trend is very similar to that in the bulk in spite of a better signal-to-noise ratio leading to unambiguous evolution. We thus conclude that Co3+ turns into Co4+ below 4.4 V on the surface, which is confirmed by the careful comparison between the magnified parts, as shown in Fig. 3(c).

Fig. 3. (color online) (a) Normalized Co L2,3-edge x-ray absorption spectra, (b) normalized oxygen K-edge x-ray absorption spectra of Li1−xCoO2 with respect to the cut-off voltage in the TEY mode, and ((c) and (d)) magnified parts of Co L3 and O K pre-edge spectra above 4.4 V, respectively, which are convenient for comparison.

The evolution of surficial O is revealed by the TEY spectra of O K-edge in Fig. 3(b). While the battery is charged from 3.9 V to 4.4 V, relative intensities among b1, b2 and a evolve more notably than the changes of bulk O, indicating the interface undergoes more severe evolution than the bulk accompanied with side reactions. Besides, new peak features marked as c and d evolve. According to previous reports,[55,56] peaks c and d are assigned to the lithium salts from the reaction between LiCoO2 and electrolyte. With the LiCoO2 cathode immersed into the electrolyte in open-circuit voltage (OCV) state, the faint peaks c and d indicate that the interface changes a bit but is stable overall. When the battery is charged to 3.9 V, peaks c and d become more obvious, indicating that interfacial reactions already take place at 3.9 V. However, the invisible change of peaks c and d from 3.9 V to 4.6 V indicates that the side reactions turn very weak.

Like the case in the bulk, the O evolution above 4.4 V draws more attention. Through the careful comparison between 4.4 V and 4.6 V shown in Fig. 3(d), the evolution is the same as that in TFY spectra except that the amplitude in TEY spectra is larger, suggesting that more O 2p holes evolve on the surface.

3.4. Correlation between capacity fading and evolution of electronic structure

To shed light on the mechanism of capacity fading from the viewpoint of electronic structure, the sXAS spectra of LiCoO2 cathodes with different capacity retention ratios are studied, where the samples cycled between 3 V and 4.6 V are taken for example because of the most severe capacity degradation. Since the O K-edge is more sensitive to the evolution than the Co L-edge, only the TEY and TFY spectra of the O K-edge are shown.

The TFY data of the LiCoO2 cathodes in the 1st cycle are shown in Fig. 4(a). The fully discharged state (i.e., discharged to 3 V) looks like the pristine state except remaining weak features of b1 and b2. It indicates that most of the LiCoO2 in the bulk evolves reversibly in spite of a bit residual of Co4+. In comparison, the surficial evolution is much more severe as shown in Fig. 4(b). For the fully discharged state, the stronger features b1 and b2 while the weaker peak a indicate more residuals of Co4+ on the surface.

Fig. 4. (color online) (a) TFY and (b) TEY spectra of O K-edge of LiCoO2 cathodes in the 1st cycle, (c) TFY and (d) TEY spectra of O K-edge of LiCoO2 cathodes at fully charged state or fully discharged state with various capacity retention ratios.

The capacity degradation during cycling is further studied. As shown in Fig. 4(c), the TFY spectra of fully charged states regardless of capacity retention ratios have little changes compared with the fully charged state in the 1st cycle. It indicates the Co–O bonds at fully charged states are very similar regardless of capacity degradation. However, in the fully discharged states, the spectra with capacity retention of 72% and 50% look very similar to the fully charged states except a small hump corresponding to peak a, which is very different from the evolution in the 1st cycle. It indicates that more Co4+ ions cannot return back to Co3+ but stay at the fully charged state, leading to the capacity fading. The invisible evolution with the ratio from 72% to 50% might indicate that the structural change plays a less important role in the capacity fading after many cycles.

The TEY data are shown in Fig. 4(d) to study the surficial evolution. The intrinsic signal from LiCoO2 is submerged by peaks c and d with capacity fading regardless of charged states or discharged states. It indicates that a large quantity of lithium salts are generated on the surface of the LiCoO2 cathode after many cycles. The intensity of peaks b1, b2, and a become weaker with the capacity retention ratio decreasing from 99% to 42% at the fully charged state and from 72% to 50% at the fully discharged state. It indicates more and more lithium salts aggregate on the surface and they might be the decisive factor to capacity degradation after many cycles. What is more, it should be noted that the difference in spectrum between the fully discharged state and fully charged state is much larger than the difference in spectrum between the different retention ratios at the same state. This indicates that the surface layer experiences reactions involving decomposition and formation with a certain reversibility during cycling.

The spectra of O K-edge of LiCoO2 in fully charged state cycled 10 times with cutoff voltages of 4.4 V and 4.6 V are compared. As shown in Fig. 5(a), the TFY data are much similar, indicating that the Co–O bonds are almost the same at fully charged states. When we observe the TEY spectra shown in Fig. 5(b), peaks c and d become dominant in both cases, indicating that a large quantity of lithium salts cover the surface. The weaker intrinsic feature of the LiCoO2 cycled at 4.6 V demonstrates the more aggregations of lithium salts, which contribute to a larger capacity fading.

Fig. 5. (color online) (a) TFY and (b) TEY spectra of O K-edge of LiCoO2 cathodes after 10 cycles with cutoff voltages of 4.4 V and 4.6 V.
4. Conclusions

In summary, the charge compensation and capacity degradation are studied by the soft x-ray absorption spectroscopy at Co L2,3 and O K-edge in TFY and TEY modes.

The charge compensation from the oxidation of Co3+ is below 4.4 V while only O provide electrons above 4.4 V. The local O 2p holes are observed and its evolution gives an explanation to the origin of or even O2. Besides, the evolution of surficial O is more severe than that of the bulk.

The residual Co4+ in the bulk is detected with LiCoO2 discharged to 3 V in the 1st cycle. More Co4+ ions appear on the surface as well as a bit of lithium salts are generated, which indicates that the interface undergoes more severe evolution including side reactions. By comparing the samples with various capacity retention ratios, Co–O bonds at the fully charged states are always found to be similar regardless of capacity degradation. In fully discharged states, a large number of Co–O bonds seem to be pinned at the fully charged states, where the mechanism needs further study. The similarity between the fully discharged states with ratios of 72% and 50% indicates that the structural change in the bulk is less related to the capacity degradation. The gradual aggregation of lithium salts on the surface, which is related to the decomposition and re-formation of the surface layer, is found to be more important for the capacity degradation. The present study helps to understand the aggravating capacity degradation with cutoff voltage increasing from 4.4 V to 4.6 V.

Reference
[1] Mizushima K Jones P C Wiseman P J Goodenough J B 1980 Mater. Res. Bull. 15 783
[2] Ozawa K 1994 Solid State Ion. 69 212
[3] Luo W Dahn J R 2009 Electrochim. Acta 54 4655
[4] Chen Z Lu Z Dahn J R 2002 J. Electrochem. Soc. 149 A1604
[5] Jang Y I Dudney N J Blom D A Allard L F 2002 J. Electrochem. Soc. 149 A1442
[6] Aurbach D Markovsky B Rodkin A Levi E Cohen Y S Kim H J Schmidt M 2002 Electrochim. Acta 47 4291
[7] Choi S S Lim H S 2002 J. Power Sources 111 130
[8] Zhang L Wang L Lyu C Li J Zheng J 2014 Energies 7 6282
[9] Wang Z Wang Z Peng W Guo H Li X Wang J Qi A 2014 Ionics 20 1525
[10] Tebbe J L Holder A M Musgrave C B 2015 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7 24265
[11] Yano A Shikano M Ueda A Sakaebe H Ogumi Z 2017 J. Electrochem. Soc. 164 A6116
[12] Zhang S Li W J Ling S G Li H Zhou Z B Chen L Q 2015 Chin. Phys. 24 078201
[13] Oh S Lee J K Byun D Cho W I Won Cho B 2004 J. Power Sources 132 249
[14] Sun Y K Cho S W Myung S T Amine K Prakash J 2007 Electrochim. Acta 53 1013
[15] Dai X Wang L Xu J Wang Y Zhou A Li J 2014 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 6 15853
[16] Aydinol M K Kohan A F Ceder G Cho K Joannopoulos J 1997 Phys. Rev. 56 1354
[17] Ceder G Chiang Y M Sadoway D R Aydinol M K Jang Y I Huang B 1998 Nature 392 694
[18] Goodenough J B Kim Y 2010 Chem. Mater. 22 587
[19] Laubach S Laubach S Schmidt P C Ensling D Schmid S Jaegermann W Thißen A Nikolowski K Ehrenberg H 2009 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 11 3278
[20] Ling S G Gao J Xiao R J Chen L Q 2016 Chin. Phys. 25 018208
[21] Yang W Liu X Qiao R Olalde-Velasco P Spear J D Roseguo L Pepper J X Chuang Y D Denlinger J D Hussain Z 2013 J. Electron. Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 190 64
[22] Kemp J P Cox P A 1990 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2 15
[23] Galakhov V R Kurmaev E Z Uhlenbrock S Neumann M Kellerman D G Gorshkov V S 1996 Solid State Commun. 99 221
[24] Montoro L A Abbate M Almeida E C Rosolen J M 1999 Chem. Phys. Lett. 309 14
[25] Montoro L A Abbate M Rosolen J M 1999 Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 3 410
[26] Uchimoto Y Sawada H Yao T 2001 J. Synchrotron Rad. 8 872
[27] Graetz J Hightower A Ahn C C Yazami R Rez P Fultz B 2002 J. Phys. Chem. 106 1286
[28] Yoon W S Kim K B Kim M G Lee M K Shin H J Lee J M Lee J S Yo C H 2002 J. Phys. Chem. 106 2526
[29] Yoon W S Kim K B Kim M G Lee M K Shin H J Lee J M 2002 J. Electrochem. Soc. 149 A1305
[30] Chen C H Hwang B J Chen C Y Hu S K Chen J M Sheu H S Lee J F 2007 J. Power Sources. 174 938
[31] Dahéron L Dedryvère R Martinez H Ménétrier M Denage C Delmas C Gonbeau D 2008 Chem. Mater 20 583
[32] Dahéron L Martinez H Dedryvère R Baraille I Ménétrier M Denage C Delmas C Gonbeau D 2009 J. Phys. Chem. 113 5843
[33] Taguchi N Sakaebe H Tatsumi K Akita T 2015 E-J. Surf. Sci. Nanotech. 13 284
[34] Liu X Liu J Qiao R Yu Y Li H Suo L Hu Y S Chuang Y D Shu G Chou F Weng T C Nordlund D Sokaras D Wang Y J Lin H Barbiellini B Bansil A Song X Liu Z Yan S Liu G Qiao S Richardson T J Prendergast D Hussain Z de Groot F M F Yang W 2012 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134 13708
[35] Liu X Wang D Liu G Srinivasan V Liu Z Hussain Z Yang W 2013 Nat. Commun. 4 2568
[36] Liu X Yang W Liu Z 2014 Adv. Mater. 26 7710
[37] Liu X Wang Y J Barbiellini B Hafiz H Basak S Liu J Richardson T Shu G Chou F Weng T C Nordlund D Sokaras D Moritz B Devereaux T P Qiao R Chuang Y D Bansil A Hussain Z Yang W 2015 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17 26369
[38] Qiao R Wray L A Kim J H Pieczonka N P W Harris S J Yang W 2015 J. Phys. Chem. 119 27228
[39] Wang L Song J Qiao R Wray L A Hossain M A Chuang Y D Yang W Lu Y Evans D Lee J J Vail S Zhao X Nishijima M Kakimoto S Goodenough J B 2015 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137 2548
[40] Yang W Qiao R 2016 Chin. Phys. 25 017104
[41] Mizokawa T Wakisaka Y Sudayama T Iwai C Miyoshi K Takeuchi J Wadati H Hawthorn D G Regier T Z Sawatzky G A 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 056404
[42] Kumagai Y Ikeno H Oba F Matsunaga K Tanaka I 2008 Phys. Rev. 77 155124
[43] Merz M Nagel P Pinta C Samartsev A v Löhneysen H Wissinger M Uebe S Assmann A Fuchs D Schuppler S 2010 Phys. Rev. 82 174416
[44] Mesilov V V Galakhov V R Gizhevskii B A Semenova A S Kellerman D G Raekers M Neumann M 2013 Phys. Solid State 55 943
[45] van Elp J Wiel J L Eskes H Kuiper P Sawatzky G A de Groot F M F Turner T S 1991 Phys. Rev. 44 6090
[46] Cao K Jiao L Liu Y Liu H Wang Y Yuan H 2015 Adv. Funct. Mater. 25 1082
[47] Kang Q Cao L Li J Huang J Xu Z Cheng Y Wang X Bai J Li Q 2016 Ceram. Int. 42 15920
[48] Bora D K Cheng X Kapilashrami M Glans P A Luo Y Guo J H 2015 J. Synchrotron Rad. 22 1450
[49] Wolverton C Zunger A 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 606
[50] Lee J Papp J K Clément R J Sallis S Kwon D H Shi T Yang W McCloskey B D Ceder G 2017 Nat. Commun. 8 981
[51] Luo K Roberts M R Hao R Guerrini N Pickup D M Liu Y S Edström K Guo J Chadwick A V Duda L C Bruce P G 2016 Nat. Chem. 8 684
[52] Xu J Sun M Qiao R Renfrew S E Ma L Wu T Hwang S Nordlund D Su D Amine K Lu J McCloskey B D Yang W Tong W 2018 Nat. Commun. 9 947
[53] Kang J S Kim D H Hwang J H Baik J Shin H J Kim M Jeong Y H Min B I 2010 Phys. Rev. 82 193102
[54] Oishi M Yamanaka K Watanabe I Shimoda K Matsunaga T Arai H Ukyo Y Uchimoto Y Ogumi Z Ohta T 2016 J. Mater. Chem. 4 9293
[55] Outka D A Stöhr J Madix R J Rotermund H H Hermsmeier B Solomon J 1987 Surf. Sci. 185 53
[56] Yogi C Takamatsu D Yamanaka K Arai H Uchimoto Y Kojima K Watanabe I Ohta T Ogumi Z 2014 J. Power Sources 248 994